The BASIL project started in 2015 and there are now about 10 campuses that are actively engaged with the curriculum in undergraduate biochemistry labs. The student manual is available on the BASILbiochem site at GitHub. In addition to challenging our students to combine computational and wet lab methods, we also challenge them with a genuine research experience. In this process we believe that our students are changing and growing as scientists. We know that we are all changing and growing as their instructors. We are excited about the assessment we have already conducted on both groups (students and faculty) and plan to build on our past efforts. We are particularly interested in

1. your insights and perspectives on assessing student growth as scientists; 
2. your ideas on how faculty members need to change the way to teach lab courses to effectively incorporate research and discovery; and 
3. barriers you have faced as you have attempted to change your lab courses to incorporate research activities.

Very cool! It is interesting that the students are driving their learning and development as scientists. In terms of Carlone and Johnson's (2007) work on recognition of identity. I wonder how students recognize each other as experts and how this is affected by or affects their interactions with scientists. For example, do all students equally feel qualified to contact scientists or just certain students?

A great project. You ask about how faculty need to change the way they teach labs. In terms of student ownership of their work we are finding that less really is more. The more the lab approaches a research group setting rather than a teaching lab, the more the students take ownership

Great Project!

Its great to see the model being implemented at multiple campuses. It is interesting that the faculty felt uncomfortable when they didn't know the answer. Did you provide some coaching or advice regarding this? If so what?

We are finisihing up an NSF CURE grant at Santa Rosa Junior College.  There were a couple of comments in your video that jumped out at me:

the need for problem solving and iteration in science: I wonder if this is a key component of students beginning their path to becoming a scientist.

The discomfort with not knowing the answer: I see a differnt type of student succeeding in the CURE than in a more traditional lab. These are often not the A student who aces the exams. Instead it is the student who might be more creative and have better problem solving skills. And in the end, those are key to being a good scientist

Thank you for producing and sharing this video. As facilitators we were asked to comment on each video we were assigned to "seed" discussion. For me, other things in life got in the way before I could so for this video. But I think that is actually fortunate in this case because of the great discussion that has already been posted here. A couple of thoughts that might then "seed" additional comments:

ON FRUSTRATION ABOUT NOT KNOWING THE ANSWER: I think this is a malady in part of faculty being seen as the sage on the stage rather than a facilitator for helping students construct their own knowledge. I used to be a member of the Biology Department at Colby College many years ago. On the first day of class, especially in my upper level undergraduate courses, I would tell my students that one of my goals for the course is that by the end they would be frustrated. I explained that the frustration would come from not having me be able to answer some of their questions. One reason for this is because even though I have a Ph.D., nobody can know everything. But I could help with search strategies to find answers (this was in the days before Google). But, I also told my students every once in awhile they would come up with questions for which there were no answers up to that time. Thus, I told them that I hoped that they would be frustrated enough by that situation to go out and do something about it. 

This was well before anybody had envisioned what are now CUREs. So now students actually do have the means to try to do something about it (they won't always succeed, of course) and, as this video clearly demonstrates, there are now powerful tools to help them come up with new insights and new ways of looking at things that couldn't have been examined in the past. I think that these can be powerful and empowering messages to our students.

THOUGHTS AND RESOURCES ON HOW FACULTY NEED TO CHANGE THE WAYS THEY TEACH LAB COURSES TO INCORPORATE RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY: First, the resources: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, where I worked for 24 years as a member of the staff, has published two reports on undergraduate research experiences. One is a report from a 2015 convocation that focused on CUREs and issues related to them, for which I served as the project director: Integrating Discovery-Based Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Report of a Convocation. The second is a report from a two-year consensus study looking at the research evidence for efficacy of many types of undergraduate research experiences that was published in 2017 for which I served as a staff member: Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities.

If I could summarize the issues addressed by these reports, I would say that this is a systems problem. It can be visualized as four legs supporting a stool. If any one of them is broken or removed, the chair wobbles or collapses. The four legs can be summarized as

1) Curriculum. For CUREs this would represent the types of research questions and the pathways to addressing them.

2) Instruction: As noted by a number of the comments above, CUREs require a very different approach to "teaching" than more traditional courses, where the faculty member serves more as a person who provides guided facilitation rather than as primarily a font of knowledge. Of course, rather than being seen as a "different" approach to educating, my hope is that one day this approach will become the norm.

3) Professional Development: Faculty who have been steeped in the cultures of their disciplines and, at least until recently, the cultures of their departments and institutions, have not had to face the challenges of focusing on active learning and helping students pose their own questions and follow their own ideas. As noted in some of the comments above, many are very capable of doing this and often thrive after they get over the paradigm shift from being told and then rewarded for regurgitating what they've been told. So, both current and future faculty need to readjust both their approaches and expectations about what constitutes quality and effective teaching. These efforts require resources to make them happen and recognition in meaningful ways for those educators who take the chance and make these important transitions. 

4. Assessments of learning. CUREs require very different approaches to assessing learning compared with traditional courses. Some students who are used to be rewarded for the providing the "right" answers may not be willing to take the chance of something they perceive might lower their GPAs if they can't get meaningful data in the time allotted. Thus, assessing student learning, progress, and other traits requires some very hard thinking by faculty, making clear their expectations to students, and integrating the assessment approaches into the fabric of the CURE.

There are a number of other videos for which I've been asked to serve a facilitator that also discuss CUREs, and I have provided related comments in those, as have other viewers. 

Thank you again for producing this video and stimulating this thought-provoking discussion!

Hello All! My name is Ivory Toldson, professor at Howard University, president of Quality Education for Minorities, and one of the facilitators for the STEM for All Video Showcase. The conversation is off to a great start and I will be chiming in with my own input this afternoon and over the next few days. I'm excited about what we can achieve for the next generation of STEM learners!

Very impressive work. Thank you for sharing the challenges that you faced throughout this process. It seems as though this format has stirred collaboration in the classroom and created an environment which is solution focused by challenging students' problem-solving skills. What have you found to be the most rewarding while conducting this research? What broader impacts are you expecting to see as the program continues?

Ivory, thank you for your comments. I personally have found the most rewarding part of this project to be my involvement in the educational research community. As a mid-career faculty member, I feel like I have finally found my "people" and am enjoying the challenge of a new research trajectory. As far as broader impacts, we are hopeful that more campuses will adopt the BASIL curriculum so that we can increase the number of students participating in authentic inquiry in biochemistry. We also are assessing student learning and development as scientists and hope that our findings enrich the CURE community.

This is a great project. If I wasn't already involved in something I would be begging to be involved.

How do you deal with expensive or complicated functional assays?

This is a great project. I am enjoying seeing the various ways CUREs are being designed and implemented in these presentations. I smiled at the comments about faculty being uncomfortable with not knowing the answers. The students and faculty grow in partnership as they work together and sometimes the students become the experts. I was interested in what you considered "expert" scientific behaviors and in whether these behaviors once acquired in BASIL transfer to other courses.

Thank you Judith. As far as the "expert" scientific behaviors, BASIL team members Trevor Anderson and Stefan Irby at Purdue have been asking the question: "What are the sources of data, representations and types of reasoning skills scientists use when trying to elucidate protein function?" and then assessing whether students engaged in BASIL are developing these same skills. Here is a recent paper on this work: Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018 Sep;46(5):478-492. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21173.

We certainly hope that the skills developed in BASIL will transfer to other courses (and beyond). We have no formal data showing this yet, but anecdotally, for my students at least, they have commented that they have used the skills learned in other classes and that discussing their BASIL experience helped them land an internship or job. If you have any suggestions on how to formally access this idea please share!